Voting Process For Enterprise Agreement

Voting Process For Enterprise Agreement

In addition, a negotiating representative of a worker covered by the agreement may not conduct standard negotiations concerning the agreement. Typical negotiations are cases where a negotiator represents two or more proposed company agreements and seeks to conclude joint agreements with two or more employers. However, these are not standard negotiations if the negotiator is actually trying to reach an agreement. If an employer plans to ask workers to vote on the proposed agreement on Wednesday, February 25, 2015, the access period will run from Tuesday, February 17, 2015, midnight to Tuesday, February 24, 2015. These measures are intended to ensure that staff genuinely accept the terms of the company agreement. The Full Bench found that the agreement had been reached with boot, but McNab Constructions had provided no evidence that it followed the right steps during the access phase. On this basis, Full Bench was unable to determine whether McNab Constructions` statement on the company agreement was appropriate to its employees, as it did not know how the terms and effects of the terms were communicated to employees. As a result, Full Bench could not see that the employees actually accepted the company agreement. A registered agreement establishes the working conditions between an employee or group of workers and one or more employers. Company negotiations are usually the process of negotiation between the employer, workers and their negotiators with the aim of concluding a company agreement.

The Fair Work Act 2009 sets out a number of clear rules and obligations on how this process is to take place, including the rules for negotiation, the content of company agreements and how an agreement is concluded and approved. When planning the approval process for your new company agreement, there are a number of things you should think about. If you opt for cooperation with us, we document everything in a detailed plan before the vote begins. We take the same meticulous approach every turn, regardless of the size of the electorate. If the parties are unable to agree on the terms of a proposed company agreement, a negotiator may apply to the Fair Work Commission and request assistance. As the pre-approval requirements of the Fair Work Act were not met, the agreement was not eligible for approval. Therefore, in individual cases, an employer may have informed some or all employees of the date, place and method of voting after the start of the access period, but based on the facts of the individual case, the Fair Work Board may not be satisfied that the employer took all reasonable steps at the beginning of the access period. [5] The Commission noted that if the Fair Work Act had provided for a definition of majority requiring a “rounding rule”, it would have been inclined to favour the union`s approach. However, in the absence of such a definition, the Commission found that a simple majority or the largest number of valid votes takes precedence over the smallest number. As a result, the agreement was approved. Interestingly, the plenary noted that it needed evidence that the terms and effect of those conditions had been explained to employees (and not to an employer who simply said they had made that statement) if a company agreement was not simply a general rollover with a discreet and obvious change.

for example, a simple salary increase as a percentage of wages. Employers often make mistakes during this period by not providing employees with the relevant documents 7 days before the vote or by not providing employees with sufficient information about the agreement during this period, but assuming that prior explanations during the bargaining process are sufficient. .


Обсуждение закрыто.